In the Gambia, a nation that has long yearned for democratic progress and stability, the prospect of President Adama Barrow seeking a third term raises not just eyebrows but significant concerns. Barrow, who came to power promising a transition away from the dictatorial shadow of Yahya Jammeh, now appears set on extending his tenure, a move that could undo the fragile democratic gains made since 2016.
Barrow’s first term was marked by optimism. He promised to restore the rule of law, combat corruption, and foster economic growth. However, as we look back at his stewardship over the last eight years, the reality seems far from these aspirations. Economic development has been sluggish, with unemployment rates, particularly among the youth, remaining alarmingly high. Corruption allegations have not diminished but have found new avenues, and the promised constitutional reform, including term limits, has been stalled or manipulated to suit his political convenience.
Recent reports suggest that despite the rhetoric of democratic reforms, the administration has been criticized for actions that echo the autocratic tendencies it was meant to eradicate. The arrest of journalists and critics, the suppression of protests, and the apparent backtracking on term limits are red flags that cannot be ignored.
Seeking a third term, especially without a definitive new constitution limiting presidential terms, could signal Barrow’s intent to consolidate power in a manner reminiscent of his predecessor. The absence of term limits in the current 1997 Constitution has been a contentious issue, with many Gambians advocating for a clear two-term limit to prevent the kind of long-term rulership that led to Jammeh’s 22-year reign. Barrow’s reluctance to finalize a new constitution that would include such limits suggests a personal interest in maintaining power beyond what might be considered healthy for Gambian democracy.
The political landscape in The Gambia has been volatile, with the opposition and civil society groups actively pushing against any slide back into authoritarianism. Barrow’s decision to seek another term could exacerbate political tensions, potentially leading to unrest or violence. His comments about making political opponents wait longer for a power shift have caused a stir, indicating a possible clampdown on political freedoms.
Moreover, the political strategy of aligning with Jammeh’s former allies, as seen in the alliance with the APRC, questions the integrity of Barrow’s democratic credentials. Such partnerships can muddy the waters of justice and reconciliation, especially considering the unresolved human rights abuses from Jammeh’s era, which Barrow promised to address.
The citizens of The Gambia, the media, civil society, and international observers must rally against this potential slide back into a one-person rule. The Gambia needs leaders who will serve with integrity, uphold the democratic values they campaign on, and ensure that power does not corrupt their stewardship.
The Gambian electorate must critically assess the implications of allowing Barrow another term. They must demand transparency, accountability, and a clear path toward a constitution that safeguards democracy. Without these, the country risks repeating history, where power is centralized and democracy is a facade.
Given his administration’s track record, President Barrow’s ambition for a third term poses a clear and present danger to The Gambia’s democratic journey. The time is now for all stakeholders to stand firm, demand better governance, and ensure the democratic process is preserved and strengthened. Let this be a moment when The Gambia chooses progress over regression, where the people’s will shapes the future, not the whims of those in power.
