By Ousman Saidykhan
The Gambian Magistrates have announced their decision to initiate a sit-down strike in response to the Inspector General of Police’s (IGP) recent order withdrawing security officials from all magistrates, except for Principal Magistrates.
In a two-page letter addressed to the Chief Justice, Hon. Hassan B. Jallow, the Magistrates’ Association expressed their concerns regarding the decision, stating that it has led to an “increased security risk for magistrates.”
They stressed that, under the current circumstances, it has become “unattainable” for them to continue presiding over cases safely.
The situation has prompted calls for intervention from the Chief Justice as magistrates seek to address their security concerns and ensure a conducive environment for judicial proceedings. The outcome of this dispute could have significant implications for the functioning of the judiciary in the country.
“It is imperative that measures must be put in place to either reinstate the police orderlies or provide alternative security arrangements that will provide the necessary protection for magistrates as they perform their essential duties.
“Until such assurances of safety can be made, the continuation of our judicial duties becomes increasingly challenging, and we regret to inform you that we cannot sit in court under these conditions,” said the association, while requesting the Chief Justice to “immediately” and engage the authorities.
According to media reports, the IGP’s decision is meant to address the personnel shortage at the borders, which causes security challenges. However, the association said it has raised concerns among its members, arguing that the decision exposes them to “potential security risks.”
“The presence of police orderlies has been integral in ensuring a safe and secure environment for carrying out judicial functions. Their withdrawal poses a direct threat to the well-being of magistrates and can hinder the swift and impartial administration of justice,” said the association, adding that the absence of security could compromise their independence.
The association said its members make “impartial” decisions that could “occasionally” provoke “strong” reactions. The presence of orderlies has been crucial in ensuring their safety and maintaining the integrity of the judicial process.
“Their sudden withdrawal leaves us vulnerable to potential threats and intimidation, which is a risk we cannot afford to take.
“The absence of adequate security measures compromises both our personal safety and professional responsibilities, creating an environment where justice cannot be administered effectively or safely,” said the association.
