The National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) of The Gambia and the Media Council of The Gambia (MCG) have issued robust rebuttals to a recent statement by the Gambia Press Union (GPU), dismissing its allegations of bias and misconduct as unfounded and misleading. The responses come amid escalating tensions over claims that the NHRC and MCG are manipulating media narratives and undermining due process, accusations both institutions have labeled as attacks on their integrity and independence.
In a strongly worded statement, the NHRC condemned what it described as “false and misleading” allegations circulating on social media and attributed to the GPU. The claims suggested that the NHRC, led by Chairperson Emmanuel Joof, influenced the media to favor individuals under media investigation. The Commission categorically rejected these accusations, emphasizing its commitment to impartiality, professionalism, and adherence to its legal mandate. Established to promote and protect human rights, the NHRC mediates disputes, investigates violations, and advises on human rights matters without fear or favor.
“The NHRC operates with fairness and respect for all, regardless of religion, ethnicity, gender, political affiliation, or social status,” the statement read. The Commission expressed concern that such unverified claims could erode public trust in its work, urging the media, civil society, and stakeholders to verify facts before making damaging assertions. It reaffirmed its dedication to transparency, accountability, and justice, calling for constructive dialogue to strengthen its mission. “We remain steadfast in protecting the rights and freedoms of all people in The Gambia,” the NHRC concluded, thanking the public for its support.
Similarly, the Media Council of The Gambia issued a sharp rebuke of the GPU’s report, describing it as “baseless, misleading, and an affront to due process.” The MCG specifically addressed allegations targeting Chairperson Babucarr Cham, Executive Secretary Bai Emil Touray, and NHRC Chairperson Joof, accusing the GPU of failing to consult the accused, thereby violating principles of fair hearing. The Council dismissed claims that it coerced journalist Mustapha Darboe into issuing a joint statement with former Justice Minister Abubacarr Ba Tambadou, calling the accusation a “calculated distortion” designed to mislead the public.
The MCG underscored its role as an independent, self-regulatory body tasked with resolving media disputes through mediation and arbitration. It cited a prior successful mediation involving journalist Yankuba Jallow and the GPU Secretary General as evidence of its impartiality. In the Darboe-Tambedou matter, the MCG clarified that its role was strictly mediatory, with Darboe retaining full autonomy over his decisions. The Council accused the GPU of rushing to judgment without engaging the MCG or verifying facts, which undermined the Union’s credibility.
“The GPU’s failure to seek clarification from the Media Council before publishing such serious allegations is a disservice to journalistic ethics,” the MCG stated. It urged the GPU to support, rather than undermine, independent institutions critical to press freedom. The Council also reminded the public that its decisions are subject to internal appeal mechanisms, inviting dissatisfied parties to seek redress through established channels rather than public attacks.
The NHRC and MCG expressed disappointment at the GPU’s approach, arguing that its actions risked sowing division and weakening institutions vital to The Gambia’s democratic progress. The NHRC called for responsible engagement from all stakeholders, while the MCG vowed to continue fostering dialogue and professionalism in the media sector.
