The Commonwealth Lawyers Association (CLA) has endorsed the Gambia Bar Association’s (GBA) decision to challenge the appointment of Chief Justice Pa Edi M.O. Faal before the Supreme Court, calling it a legitimate constitutional process that underscores the role of an independent legal profession in upholding the rule of law.
In a statement issued on 5 August 2026, the London-based body noted the GBA’s 31 July announcement that it had filed proceedings questioning whether Faal’s appointment meets the constitutional requirements for the office. The CLA stressed that the case raises a constitutional question rather than a personal attack on the judge.
The intervention adds an international dimension to a dispute already sparking debate within Gambia’s legal community. The GBA described its lawsuit as “unprecedented and extraordinary,” while emphasizing that it does not question Justice Faal’s integrity, competence or professional record. Instead, it seeks judicial clarification on whether the appointment complies with the Constitution following President Adama Barrow’s nomination.
The CLA said it supports independent bar associations that defend the legal profession, judicial independence and the rule of law. It highlighted that the Chief Justice occupies a pivotal role in constitutional disputes, election petitions and human rights cases, making the appointment process essential to public confidence in the judiciary.
Citing the Commonwealth (Latimer House) Principles on the Three Branches of Government, the association noted that an independent, impartial and competent judiciary, supported by an effective legal profession, is vital to safeguarding the rule of law. By referring the matter to the Supreme Court and pledging to abide by its ruling, the GBA is fulfilling its duty as an independent Bar, the CLA said.
The association urged all parties to respect the GBA’s right to bring the case, conduct themselves with professionalism and accept the Court’s eventual decision. It said it would monitor the proceedings closely.
The outcome of the challenge is expected to clarify constitutional rules on judicial appointments and could influence future selections to Gambia’s highest courts.
