Massive crowds rally in Israel as vote on judicial overhaul looms

Protesters hold Israeli flags as they attend a gathering on a day of planned mass demonstrations against Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his nationalist coalition government's judicial overhaul, near the Western Wall, Judaism's holiest prayer site in Jerusalem [Amir Cohen/Reuters]

Protesters set up camp outside Israeli parliament as hundreds of thousands rally in Tel Aviv against far-right government’s judicial plans.

Tens of thousands of Israelis have marched into Jerusalem and more protesters took to the streets in Tel Aviv in a last-ditch show of force aimed at blocking Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s contentious judicial overhaul plan.

Protests have intensified in the days leading up to the debate that began Sunday ahead of a parliamentary vote on Monday which could see a key part of the proposals passed into law.

The bill would limit the Supreme Court’s powers to void what it considers “unreasonable” government or ministerial decisions. Critics view the legislation as a threat to Israel’s democracy.

In Jerusalem on Saturday, marchers turned the city’s main entrance into a sea of blue and white Israeli flags as they completed the last leg of a four-day, 70km (43 miles) trek from Tel Aviv to Israel’s parliament.

A protester against the Israeli government's judicial overhaul plans checks her phone inside a tent in a camp protesters erected in Jerusalem July 23
A protester against the Israeli government’s judicial overhaul plans checks her phone inside a tent in a camp protesters erected in Jerusalem on July 23, 2023 [Ronen Zvulun/Reuters]

The group, which grew from hundreds to thousands as the march progressed, were welcomed by throngs of cheering protesters before they set up camp in rows of small white tents outside the Knesset before the expected vote.

“Democracy is not as certain as it used to be,” said Ido Golan, a protester from central Israel who joined with his partner and two young children, one on his back in a baby carrier.

“It’s very important for us and also for them to know we did what we can to save the democracy.”

Meanwhile, hundreds of thousands flooded the streets of the coastal city of Tel Aviv on Saturday, the country’s business and cultural capital, as well as in Beersheba, Haifa and Netanya.

‘Guard our democracy’

Early on Sunday, hundreds of protesters prayed at the Western Wall in Israeli-annexed east Jerusalem, the holiest place where Jews can pray.

Carrying Israeli flags, many also formed a human chain at different locations in Jerusalem, including in front of Jaffa Gate in the Old City.

“We have to keep the pressure, we have to guard our democracy,” protester Amir Goldstein told the AFP news agency, who spent the night in a tent near parliament.

Speaking in parliament, opposition leader Yair Lapid called for Netanyahu to resume compromise talks and lauded the protesters for standing up to the government.

“The government of Israel launched a war of attrition against the citizens of Israel and discovered the people can’t be broken. We won’t give up on our children’s future,” he said.

Al Jazeera’s Mohammed Jamjoom, reporting from West Jerusalem outside the Israeli Knesset, said there was a “massive” crowd of people outside protesting.

“You have so many demonstrators chanting pro-democracy slogans. They say the situation is extremely dire,” he added.

“We were speaking to demonstrator … who said they were out protesting because this was the moment the guillotine was about to fall. They are worried that if this contentious bill passes … it will move the country from a democracy to autocracy.”

‘Fatal blows’

Netanyahu and his far-right allies claim the overhaul is needed to curb what they say are the excessive powers of unelected judges. But their critics say the plan will destroy the country’s system of checks and balances and put it on the path towards authoritarian rule.

Joe Biden, the president of the United States, has also urged Netanyahu to halt the plan and seek a broad consensus.

The proposed overhaul has drawn harsh criticism from business and medical leaders, and a fast-rising number of military reservists in key units have said they will stop reporting for duty if the plan passes.

An aerial view shows protesters attending a march in Tel Aviv on July 22, 2023.
Crowds attending a protest in Tel Aviv on July 22, 2023, ahead of a vote in the parliament on the Israeli government’s judicial overhaul bill [Jack Guez/ AFP]

An additional 10,000 reservists announced they were suspending duty on Saturday night, according to Brothers in Arms, a protest group representing retired soldiers.

“These are dangerous cracks,” military chief Lieutenant General Herzi Halevi wrote in a letter to soldiers on Sunday meant to address the tensions. “If we will not be a strong and cohesive military, if the best do not serve in the IDF [Israeli army], we will no longer be able to exist as a country in the region.”

More than 100 top former security chiefs, including retired military commanders, police commissioners and heads of intelligence agencies, joined those calls on Saturday, signing a letter to Netanyahu blaming him for compromising Israel’s military and urging him to halt the legislation.

The signatories included Ehud Barak, a former Israeli prime minister, and Moshe Yaalon, a former army chief and defence minister. Both are political rivals of Netanyahu.

“The legislation is crushing those things shared by Israeli society, is tearing the people apart, disintegrating the [Israeli army] and inflicting fatal blows on Israel’s security,” the former officials wrote.

“The legislative process violates the social contract that has existed for 75 years between the Israeli government and thousands of reserve officers and soldiers from the land, air, sea and intelligence branches who have volunteered for many years for the reserves to defend the democratic state of Israel, and now announce with a broken heart that they are suspending their volunteer service,” the letter said.

Israel Katz, a senior cabinet minister from Netanyahu’s Likud party, said the bill would pass one way or another on Monday.

“I represent citizens who are not ready to have their voice cancelled because of threats of refusal to serve” or by those blocking the airport, highways and train stations, he told Channel 12 TV. “There is a clear attempt here to use military service to force the government to change policy.”

Protesters against the Israeli government's plans for judicial overhaul take part in an installation named "In Vain" at which family members of Israel's fallen soldiers write notes stating that their relatives fell in vain
Protesters against the Israeli government’s plans for judicial overhaul take part in an installation named ‘In Vain’ at which family members of Israel’s fallen soldiers write notes stating that their relatives fell in vain, in Jerusalem, on July 23, 2023 [Amir Cohen/Reuters]

The final vote, scheduled for Monday, would mark the first major piece of legislation to be approved.

In addition to striking down the “reasonability” clause, the overhaul also calls for other sweeping changes aimed at curbing the powers of the judiciary, from limiting the Supreme Court’s ability to challenge parliamentary decisions to changing the way judges are selected.

Protesters, who make up a wide swath of Israeli society, see the overhaul as a power grab fuelled by various personal and political grievances of Netanyahu, who is on trial for corruption charges, and his partners, who want to deepen Israel’s control of the occupied West Bank and perpetuate controversial draft exemptions for ultra-Orthodox men.

Despite seven months of protests, Netanyahu doubled down on the overhaul early on Sunday as he released a video announcing he was to be hospitalised for a procedure to receive a pacemaker.

The 73-year-old leader said he expected to be discharged from hospital by Sunday afternoon and would head to the Knesset for the vote on the judicial bill.

He suggested that last-minute changes were possible, saying he was “still trying to reach an agreement with the opposition” on the “reasonability” clause.



Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here